Biomate Plus PDL Laser Implants
provide the best medical performance for any implantologist and patient.
To provide better dental implant experiences for both dentists and patients.
Convenient implant placement, strong osseointegration,
excellent soft and hard tissue response, and shorter overall treatment time.
Additionally, the implant offers superior bacterial resistance, making it the least prone to peri-implantitis.
The implant is ideal for minimally invasive surgery, resulting in less pain, shorter healing time, and better aesthetic outcomes.
The simplified surgical protocol ensures predictable implant osseointegration, giving dentists more confidence in performing implant surgery even in challenging bone conditions.
.png)
Selection Guideline – Idea emergence profile for each tooth.
Select the suitable implant system
| Biomate Plus Implant System | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| System |  |
 |
 |
| Size | SD | ||
| Diameter | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Length | 8/10/ 12/14 |
8/10/ 12/14 |
8/10/ 12/14 |
| Characteristic | 1. Single Pore Dimension of Abutment Design (SD) | ||
| 2. 0.3mm Platform Switch Design | |||
| 3. 0.7mm vertical smooth surface | |||
| 4. 0.8mm non-continuous parallel thread | |||
| 5. Root Form Design | |||
| 6. Arced Root Design | |||
| PDL (Precision Dimension Laser) surface treatment creates microchannels and 3D Pores, which lead the bone cell to move to the implant's surface directionally. The 3D provides the best environment for attachment and the growth of osteocytes. | |||
| Clinical Applicability | 1. D1 to D3 Bone | ||
| 2. Regular and healthy Bone | |||
| 3. For Immediate loading | |||
| 4. For minimally invasive surgery | |||
| 5. A vertical mechanical surface of 0.7mm can be used as a tissue implant and can be placed either above or below the bone plane according to the requirements of implantation depth. Biomate Plus system can be used as a tissue-type implant | |||
| Special Reminding |
If you prefer to submerge the implant, we commend Biomate plus Implant with 0.5mm submerged. If you follow up on the drill mark, please exceed the mark on the initial drill, final drill, and profile drill in case of 0.5mm submerged. | ||
| When the fixture can’t be fully screwed, or on D1 bone, please use tap. | |||
0.3mm Platform Switch Design The anti-bacterial and machined surface on the platform avoid the growth of dental plaque and decrease bone absorption. Avoid bone loss and gum recession.0.7mm Vertical Machined Surface May adjust different insertion depth according to the requirement of implant area0.8mm Non-Continuous parallel thread Excellent effect for maintaining the height of bone level
Root Form Design Tapered body for use in anatomically constricted areaSelf-Tapping Thread Design Ensure better primary stability and avoid excessive force causing cortical bone absorption and promotes bone tapering during insertion.
Arced Root Design Arc shape at the bottom of the fixture Avoid damaging vital structures like the inferior alveolar nerve or maxillary sinus.
II. TOP Concepts of Fixture Design
According to the research findings, the best designs could lead zero bone loss. These findings shows that the Biomate implant design is qualified the best factors.
A conical connection
Internal Hexagon & 10° Morse Taper Internal Hex Design
(This design makes wall thickness thicker)
Platform Switching Design
0.3mm platform switch design with machined roughness surface
Thread Design
Trapezoid Thread Design
Biological Surface
Micro-channel & 3D pore
The top design concepts are as follows:
1. There are about five types of thread designs in the present market. Among these five thread designs, the trapezoidal thread design is the best.
Even though the trapezoid thread design is still infrequent in the present market, it shows good performance with its resistance to micro movement, large bone-implant contact, stress distribution, and bone preservation.
Source:
A. Selection of Optimum Thread Shape Design on Stress Distribution Among 5 Different Implant Types: A Finite Element, Yosef Wakjira, Song Jeng Huang* and Yi Hsiung Chiu (2019), Analysis, Eng Technol Open Acc. 2019; 3(3): 555611.
2. The optimum pitch of the threads is 0.8mm.
This spacing can achieve the fastest and the best osseointegration effect.
Source:
Influence of Thread Design on Dental Implant Osseointegration Assayed Using the Lan-Yu Mini-Pig Model, Shih-Kang Chien, Shui-Sang Hsue, Chih-Shing Lin, Tzong-Fu Kuo, Duen-Jeng Wang, Jen-Chang Yang & Sheng-Yang Lee, Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering volume 37, pages627–638 (2017)
3. Bone-implant contact area has a great influence on osseointegration.
BIC（Bone-to-implant contact）is a major factor affecting stress characteristics during implantation: a range of stress magnitudes generated in the surrounding bone during implant insertion may affect peri-implant bone healing and ultimately implant stability. The range of the bone contact area has a very important impact on osseointegration.
Source:
A. Chaiwat Udomsawat, Pimduen Rungsiyakull, Chaiy Rungsiyakull, Pathawee Khongkhunthian (2018), Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three-dimensional dynamic finite element study, Clinical & Experimental Dental Research, 26 December 2018
B. Yosef Wakjira, Song Jeng Huang* and Yi Hsiung Chiu (2019), Selection of Optimum Thread Shape Design on Stress Distribution Among 5 Different Implant Types: A Finite Element Analysis, Eng Technol Open Acc. 2019; 3(3): 555611.
